"I came away from my meeting with this famous climate skeptic feeling pretty depressed. What I had seen was a scientist whose work, in my opinion, was simply not very good."
Or, to paraphrase Hitchen's Razor, "What is asserted without (rigorous) evidence can be dismissed without (rigorous) evidence."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2015/02/24/388682684/my-depressing-day-with-a-famous-climate-skeptic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
OK, even I'm concerned now that Google+ may actually be dying. Look at this plot. It's my follower count. I usually don't care ... -
If you had to choose to have only one kind of official LEGO brick separator tool, which would you prefer:
-
Oh my. :-( http://mashable.com/2016/06/01/lego-sculpture-destroyed-china/#QkPeGfNl4659
I'm have a discussion about this one elsewhere. Ethics matter!
ReplyDeleteAs the scientific case for human-caused global warming becomes more and more one-sided, what's left of the scientific support for global warming skeptics is amplified beyond reason as the media tries to do "both sides" balance. The result is that on the dwindling side you get worse and worse science held up as "good science".
ReplyDelete